The Wicked Wisdom of an E-Book Pirate
After reporting on a remarkable dialogue between blogger C. Max Magee and a book pirate we received a comment from a person named jap [sic] claiming to be a pirate too.
His posting elicited a host of comments from readers ranging from vituperative ("Pirate is too sexy a term. What you are is a petty thief") to respectful ("You have me intrigued, Jap. I would suggest you are not a typical pirate...") to grudging agreement ("In a world without pirating, a majority of people would just not buy the book. So yeah, I definitely think the impact is overrated (or over-agonized about.")
From his cover of anonymity jap responded to many of these comments and amplified on his original contention that "You have your morality and I have mine." Though we deplore piracy and are reluctant to offer a forum for its practitioners, we happen to think that it's sometimes better to listen to our adversaries than ignore them, however diabolical their reasoning may seem. This is especially true when they offer cogent suggestions about where we should be focusing our efforts to deal with piracy.
I invited "jap" to write an article for us but he declined. However, in the hopes that we can benefit from his observations, below are a few that we have gleaned from his communications. We will do our best to accept his airy reassurance: "Don't worry: the book business is not in danger."
Richard Curtis
**********************************
*You have your morality and I have mine. It is perfectly okay for me to download books (or movies btw). It was also okay to copy or print books for everybody before 1710 (when the first copyright law was passed), or buying that "unauthorized by author" book...
*Probably you are thinking just now "but it is unlawful!!" Is it necessary to explain that law and moral[ity] are not the same thing?
*Morality aside, it is probably of your interest to know that we the ebook pirates do buy books. I understand you are worried for your business but don't worry: the book business is not in danger.
*I have never read most of the books I have downloaded. One of the downloads was a file containing several thousands of books. I have also bought several of the books I previously downloaded and read. Other books I did read I would never buy them. There are also books that I did read and I will buy as soon as I find them in a bookstore. I have also bought books that I know are easy to find and download. In fact buying books is a great pleasure for me.
*Why do many people pirate? I think the answer is different for each person. In my case, I think and I feel that that Internet is a great tool to get books, tons of books. It is the greatest library and the greatest bookstore at same time.
*DRM is a Bad Idea. It decreases sales, and believe me, it has never stopped pirates.
*There is a difference between stealing and downloading. If I steal a printed book at Best Buy, Best Buy becomes poorer. If I download a Dan Brown's book, Dan Brown does not become poorer.
*Part of my money went to Dan Brown's pockets. If you are interested in business, instead of your morality, the question is why many people go to library, and download books AND buy books. For centuries books have been bought by the very same people that go to libraries.
*I am a typical pirate. Most pirates never upload works, neither sell them, just download. Also most pirates buy content in a way or other. I for instance download movies but go to movie theatres. In fact many pirates are high spending people. And many music pirates are buying CDs, the real problem of CD market is that CD is becoming obsolete. Digital sales (iTunes and alikes) are speedily increasing. Hulu is not yet available in my country but I am willing to try it as soon as possible,
*Do you really think a guy who is scanning a book and uploading it is trying to avoid buying it at Fictionwise? That's nonsense.
*How is not paying for a book in a library wrong? How is downloading for free a 1922 book (public domain) right but a 1923 book wrong?
*Until 1978 copyright term was a maximum of 56 years since the work was first published. Nowadays is 70 years since author's death. If I download a 1950 book, is that wrong or right?
*The above terms are for United States. If I live in a country where a 1989 book is in public domain, is it wrong to download it?
*Morality? Copyright is (sometimes) useful, not moral.
*Btw I prefer to buy O'Reilly ebooks, they are not DRM'd.
*It is not possible to protect copyright. You can fight for-profit piracy because you can always follow the money and because any seller (lawful or not) needs to offer his product to public. You cannot successfully fight not-for-profit piracy because it is possible to do it so privately as desired. 10 years of RIAA prosecution did get nothing.
*However may be I can be useful for your business. I am not just a pirate, I am also a customer. Sometimes I pirate books, sometimes I buy them. Obviously, if you get to maximize the times I buy then you are increasing your sales.
*As I said DRM is a Bad Idea. When people buy ebooks, they want to do things like read that book on any present and future device. So many people break the DRM (it is easy) but breaking the DRM is unlawful, so your customers have paid to be outlaws. This is not the kind of thing that discourage piracy.
*Everytime I have bought a DRMed book I broke the DRM for the above reason and I did feel fooled because I paid but I was out of law. Just imagine which is the effect on your law abiding customers. They get a product that is worse than what I get when I pirate. Do you want to reduce piracy? Sell your books sans DRM.
*My best hint for you: don't obsess with piracy, focus on selling.
*How did I read this article? It is not because it is an article about piracy, but because it is an article of this blog, and I usually read this blog because it is a good blog about the book world.
His posting elicited a host of comments from readers ranging from vituperative ("Pirate is too sexy a term. What you are is a petty thief") to respectful ("You have me intrigued, Jap. I would suggest you are not a typical pirate...") to grudging agreement ("In a world without pirating, a majority of people would just not buy the book. So yeah, I definitely think the impact is overrated (or over-agonized about.")
From his cover of anonymity jap responded to many of these comments and amplified on his original contention that "You have your morality and I have mine." Though we deplore piracy and are reluctant to offer a forum for its practitioners, we happen to think that it's sometimes better to listen to our adversaries than ignore them, however diabolical their reasoning may seem. This is especially true when they offer cogent suggestions about where we should be focusing our efforts to deal with piracy.
I invited "jap" to write an article for us but he declined. However, in the hopes that we can benefit from his observations, below are a few that we have gleaned from his communications. We will do our best to accept his airy reassurance: "Don't worry: the book business is not in danger."
Richard Curtis
**********************************
*You have your morality and I have mine. It is perfectly okay for me to download books (or movies btw). It was also okay to copy or print books for everybody before 1710 (when the first copyright law was passed), or buying that "unauthorized by author" book...
*Probably you are thinking just now "but it is unlawful!!" Is it necessary to explain that law and moral[ity] are not the same thing?
*Morality aside, it is probably of your interest to know that we the ebook pirates do buy books. I understand you are worried for your business but don't worry: the book business is not in danger.
*I have never read most of the books I have downloaded. One of the downloads was a file containing several thousands of books. I have also bought several of the books I previously downloaded and read. Other books I did read I would never buy them. There are also books that I did read and I will buy as soon as I find them in a bookstore. I have also bought books that I know are easy to find and download. In fact buying books is a great pleasure for me.
*Why do many people pirate? I think the answer is different for each person. In my case, I think and I feel that that Internet is a great tool to get books, tons of books. It is the greatest library and the greatest bookstore at same time.
*DRM is a Bad Idea. It decreases sales, and believe me, it has never stopped pirates.
*There is a difference between stealing and downloading. If I steal a printed book at Best Buy, Best Buy becomes poorer. If I download a Dan Brown's book, Dan Brown does not become poorer.
*Part of my money went to Dan Brown's pockets. If you are interested in business, instead of your morality, the question is why many people go to library, and download books AND buy books. For centuries books have been bought by the very same people that go to libraries.
*I am a typical pirate. Most pirates never upload works, neither sell them, just download. Also most pirates buy content in a way or other. I for instance download movies but go to movie theatres. In fact many pirates are high spending people. And many music pirates are buying CDs, the real problem of CD market is that CD is becoming obsolete. Digital sales (iTunes and alikes) are speedily increasing. Hulu is not yet available in my country but I am willing to try it as soon as possible,
*Do you really think a guy who is scanning a book and uploading it is trying to avoid buying it at Fictionwise? That's nonsense.
*How is not paying for a book in a library wrong? How is downloading for free a 1922 book (public domain) right but a 1923 book wrong?
*Until 1978 copyright term was a maximum of 56 years since the work was first published. Nowadays is 70 years since author's death. If I download a 1950 book, is that wrong or right?
*The above terms are for United States. If I live in a country where a 1989 book is in public domain, is it wrong to download it?
*Morality? Copyright is (sometimes) useful, not moral.
*Btw I prefer to buy O'Reilly ebooks, they are not DRM'd.
*It is not possible to protect copyright. You can fight for-profit piracy because you can always follow the money and because any seller (lawful or not) needs to offer his product to public. You cannot successfully fight not-for-profit piracy because it is possible to do it so privately as desired. 10 years of RIAA prosecution did get nothing.
*However may be I can be useful for your business. I am not just a pirate, I am also a customer. Sometimes I pirate books, sometimes I buy them. Obviously, if you get to maximize the times I buy then you are increasing your sales.
*As I said DRM is a Bad Idea. When people buy ebooks, they want to do things like read that book on any present and future device. So many people break the DRM (it is easy) but breaking the DRM is unlawful, so your customers have paid to be outlaws. This is not the kind of thing that discourage piracy.
*Everytime I have bought a DRMed book I broke the DRM for the above reason and I did feel fooled because I paid but I was out of law. Just imagine which is the effect on your law abiding customers. They get a product that is worse than what I get when I pirate. Do you want to reduce piracy? Sell your books sans DRM.
*My best hint for you: don't obsess with piracy, focus on selling.
*How did I read this article? It is not because it is an article about piracy, but because it is an article of this blog, and I usually read this blog because it is a good blog about the book world.
Labels: Book Piracy, Publishing in the 21st Century, Richard Curtis